Agendas Trump Biology and Ruin Men

Britain’s Telegraph recently reported that UK schools are teaching British children that “Trans boys and men and non-binary people may have periods” and that “menstruation must be inclusive of all genders.” You read that right.

In the span of 100 years, Britain has gone from producing men who were so eager to fight and die for their country that 16-year-olds lied about their age to enlist when the minimum age was 19, to teaching primary school boys that they can have periods just like girls and offering feminine hygiene products in boys’ bathrooms. This phenomenon isn’t unique to the U.K. U.S. colleges, like the University of Wisconsin, University of Minnesota, and Brown University offer menstrual products in their men’s rooms, in the name of “menstrual equity” and as a sop to a miniscule “transgender” population.

Can any culture—British, American or any other—raise “rough men” ready to defend it against a ruthless enemy when it cannot even fix in the minds of its developing youth what their sex is?

William F. Marshall, Peter Jackson’s Restored WWI Footage Underscores The Flaccidity Of Today’s Culture

The LEFT Seeks to Destroy Marriage

If you’re a leftist and your goal was to destroy, then remake society into whatever twisted image you had in your head of what it should be, you’d likely first go after its foundation. Could this explain why leftists have been going after marriage as an institution - and by extension the family - for decades? Destroy the means by which humans raise stable, functional, healthy members of the next generation, and you strike at the root of society itself. If you believe that traditional society (a.k.a. Western civilization) is evil at its core, as today’s leftists do, it’s a strategy that makes sense, at least in their own warped minds.

Scott Morefield, Rescuing Marriage From The Liberals, Because Civilization Is At Stake

Keep Sex Within Marriage

People:  get married.  Do NOT live together first.  Do life RIGHT.  Then be devoted to your spouse, no matter what.  ‘Til death do you part.  Keep your eyes, hearts, minds and flesh pure, your marriage bed undefiled.  And unite yourselves with your Creator, the Living God, who designed marriage to be the perfect and holy union of one man and one woman — where children are sought after, where children are a BLESSING.  You will find all this to be the GREATEST joy possible in this life.  SO MUCH MORE than the cheap imitation the devil offers. Lust and perversion is no substitute for a God-ordained sexual union within marriage.  So STOP IT!   Lord, have mercy on us, and open our eyes to see how far we have fallen from Your Holy standards.

Rob Pue, The Weed of Porn Bears Bitter Fruit

Viewing Pornography Violates Marriage

If you are a man trapped and addicted to pornography, just know that by viewing this stuff, you are not only contributing to this BILLION DOLLAR INDUSTRY that profits off the souls and lives of young girls (and the male actors as well), but you are ALSO engaging in FORNICATION, which God calls an abomination. And if you are a married man, make no mistake: you are committing ADULTERY every time you look at one of those young women with lust… you are CHEATING on your wife. You may never actually commit the physical act, but you are just as guilty. Is your wife not worth more to you than THAT?

Rob Pue, The Weed of Porn Bears Bitter Fruit

Cohabitation is More Stressful Than Marriage

According to multiple studies, cohabitation is considered more stressful than getting married.  Only about half of those who start out living together outside of wedlock EVER get married.  Those who do, are at a substantially higher risk for divorce than those who don’t live together before marriage — most divorcing within just seven years.  Co-habiting couples are also more likely to experience infidelity in their relationship, and the QUALITY of their relationship is of a poorer quality: more fighting, more violence, and less overall happiness.  Studies also show co-habiting couples have higher levels of depression and substance abuse, and also earn less money.

Rob Pue, The Weed of Porn Bears Bitter Fruit

God Did Not Create Sexual Orientations

God did not create sexual orientations. He created sexes. God gave each sex a body capable of giving physical pleasure and children to the other sex. All are heterosexual because everyone is born in the bodies of a man or a woman. This truth does not change even if one has very difficult feelings against which one must fight. Homosexuality has nothing to do with heterosexuality and the first does not equal the second. There are people who feel powerful desires towards the same sex. … But it does not change the truth that they are already heterosexual because God created them that way, so the Bible tells us. 

Robert Oscar Lopez, How Christians Confuse the Issue of Heterosexuality (What Christians Get Wrong about Heterosexuality)

Politics and Morality

Political action will not change people spiritually. Moralistic preaching did not help Sodom. The only thing that will change a Sodomite is repentance and faith.

David J. MacLeod, “The Judgment of Sodom,” The Emmaus Journal, Vol.2/No.3, pg.163

Sexual Revolution: Not a Revolt Against the Establishment

The Sexual Revolution never was a revolt against the Establishment. It was and is a revolt by the liberal Establishment against Christian morals. Indeed, such a massive, meticulous and carefully planned revolution could not progress without bad elites from decadent institutions to carry it forward. This Establishment forms a liberal culture that creates the myths, spreads the fashions and molds the opinions that eventually pressure all to conform to their ideological mindset. It pushes the more moderate elements of society toward its goal of total, unrestrained sexual license.

This revolt can also be documented and traced by the currents, media and figures that have long pushed this agenda forward.

Such an effort would never progress but for a cooperative State. Throughout history, revolutions are always carried out with State sponsorship. Even the States that the revolutionaries want to destroy often participate in their own destruction. The Sexual Revolution needs the vast resources and platform of the Sexual State because “the premises of the Sexual Revolution are false,” Dr. Morse claims. All the machinery of government must be brought to bear to override human nature. To assume the State is neutral in this great battle is the height of naiveté.

John Horvat,II, The Sexual State: A Report from the Battlefield

Men Looking For Sex are Not Looking for Marriage

A man who is looking for recreational premarital sex with a woman before marriage is not looking for marriage, but recreation. Marriage is a commitment to work hard, be disciplined, be self-sacrificial and to compromise with another person – all in close quarters. When choosing a mate, you need to look for someone who is good at commitments. Not someone who is good at fun. The ability to have fun with a man is not a good predictor of marital success because fun is unrelated to the things that a man really does in a marriage: protect, provide, and lead on moral and spiritual issues.

Wintery Knight, “New Study: Men and Women Have Different Goals and Expectations When Cohabiting.”

Freedom of Speech and Religion

There is also today a vast divergence between the liberal and conservative understandings of the First Amendment. Liberals are interested in transforming free speech into what they call equal speech, ensuring that no one gets more than his fair share. They favor a redistribution of speech rights via limits on campaign contributions, repealing the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, and narrowing the First Amendment for the sake of redistribution of speech rights from the rich to the poor. Not surprisingly, the Democratic Party’s 2016 platform called for amending the First Amendment!

There is, of course, also a big difference between the liberal Constitution’s freedom from religion and the conservative Constitution’s freedom of religion. And needless to say, the liberal Constitution has no Second Amendment.

In terms of government structure, the liberal Constitution is designed to overcome the separation of powers and most other checks and balances. Liberals consistently support the increased ability to coordinate, concentrate, and enhance government power—as opposed to dividing, restricting, or checking it. This is to the detriment of popular control of government. In recent decades, government power has flowed mainly through the hands of unelected administrators and judges—to the point that elected members of Congress find themselves increasingly dispirited and unable to legislate. As the Financial Times put it recently, “Congress is a sausage factory that has forgotten how to make sausages.”

Charles R. Kesler, “America’s Cold Civil War,” Hillsdale College Imprimis, October 2018

Israel and the United Nations

Israel is one of 193 members of the United Nations. As such, Israel is at a significant disadvantage. There is only one Jewish state in the U.N. as opposed to 56 Muslim states, virtually all of which take positions aimed at isolating, demonizing, and delegitimizing Israel whenever possible. The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) is the largest single block of U.N. members, and its positions on issues vis-a-vis Israel are almost uniformly hostile.

American Center for Law & Justice, Israel’s Fate, Our Fight, pg.33-34.

We Are Nearing the Brink of Destruction

In most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right [to keep and bear arms] within the narrowest possible limits . . . and [when] the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction.

George Tucker, 1803 Blackstone’s Commentaries regarding the Second Amendment.

The American Miracle

Since the days of the Pilgrims, leaders of the new society that arose in the New World have embraced the core concept of a divinely determined destiny. For nearly four hundred years, Americans nourished the notion that God maintained an intimate, protective connection to their singular nation. Only recently, with the emphasis on guilt over gratitude in our teaching of history, has the public grown uncomfortable with the idea that fate favors American endeavors. Today, the merest suggestion that the Almighty plays favorites among the nations of the world strikes contemporary sensibilities as offensive, outrageous, or at least controversial.

Much of that controversy involves a fundamental misunderstanding of the old idea of divine providence in the rise of the Republic. It confuses the reality of American exceptionalism with fantasies about American perfectionism. To argue that a higher power directed the United States to a unique and valuable role in the world isn’t the same as insisting that our national saga unfolded without flaw, folly, or failure. The confidence that this nation has been distinctly blessed doesn’t mean that it’s been exclusively blessed—or that it has provided an unmitigated blessing to each citizen, or to all nations, at every moment in its history. … The evidence for divine providence doesn’t prove that America is perfect, but it does strongly suggest that America is no accident.

Michael Medved, The American Miracle: Divine Providence in the Rise of the Republic, pg 359, 360

Thoughtfulness vs Thoughtlessness

In the age in which you will be living, if you’re a thoughtful person, if you ask questions, if you seek answers, if you’re willing to be honest with yourself, and if you’re willing to, as they say, call a spade a spade, you will be dismissed by the thoughtless with a label that was fed to them by a thoughtless culture, so don’t be surprised when it happens. It’s a self-defense mechanism designed to allow the name caller to acquit himself while indicting you. Evil will shout down everything contrary while providing a warm, cozy place for itself to incubate. It will counter a thoughtful, well-reasoned argument with a mind-numb chant. It will inlist the magistrate to outlaw opposing views in the name of freedom. It will enlist the court to decree what the majority rejects and declare it democracy in action, and it will actually believe its declaration. In short, evil will be thoughtless. Don’t you be.

Danny Wright, The Evil Of Thoughtlessness