As one observer of the homosexual movement has warned, "Gay activists are sexual Marxists. Legitimizing same-sex unions is a warm-up act. Ultimately they want to eliminate any barriers, any signposts, that limit or channel the exercise of human sexuality."
It actually seems that the more radical the homosexual activist, the more blatantly honest they are of their goals. They do not necessarily want marriage so that they can take advantage of its benefits. They want marriage so they can take a wrecking ball to the institution.
For example, homosexual activist William Eskridge says that he hopes gay marriage "will dethrone the traditional family base on blood relationships in favor of families we choose." Michelangelo Signorile has told activists "to fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits, and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely . . . to debunk a myth and radically alter an archaic institution . . . . The most subversive action lesbians and gay men can undertake . . . is to transform the notion of 'family' entirely." This means marriage will be no better than anonymous sodomy in a bathhouse. . . . .
Once marriage and monogamy are redefined, they both become insignificant. It is the goal of radical homosexual activists to redefine both, and end up with a situation like parts of Europe where both marriage and the family have become meaningless.
Alan Sears & Craig Osten, The Homosexual Agenda, p.96 (2003)
No comments:
Post a Comment