Friday, February 5, 2016

Why Should Darwinists Be Moral?

What Darwinists cannot do is give us a reason why we ought not simply copy nature and destroy those who are weak, unpleasant, costly, or just plain boring.  If all moral options are legitimate, then it’s acceptable for the strong to rule the weak.  No moral restraints would protect the feeble, because moral restraints simply wouldn’t exist.

Francis J. Beckwith and Gregory Koukl, “Relativism: Feet Firmly Planted in Mid-Air,” pg.160

No comments: