Homosexuality Is Contrary to Western Moral Standards

Homosexuality itself is wrong. It’s contrary to Western moral standards and, as shown by the downhill consequences (e.g., deadly diseases, family dysfunction, depression, substance abuse, suicide, etc.), is manifestly contrary to natural law. The whole agenda rests on a foundation of lies. Telling the truth about this corrupt agenda is the best and only way to dislodge its chokehold on society and culture.

If pro-family groups will not knock the hell out of the lie that “people are born that way,” they will inevitably run into the powerful civil-rights counterarguments that homosexual activists have perfected for years. We can talk about the needs of children, but let’s not forget that when proponents of civil rights for blacks and other ethnic minorities fought to end segregation, white supremacists and pro-segregationist forces also argued that they needed to maintain the racial disparities “for the children.”

Arthur Schaper, The ‘Greater Than’ Movement Is Not Enough

Make A Correct and Logical Argument Against Homosexuality

The homosexual lobby worked hard early on to shift, shape, mold, and deform public opinion to recognize homosexuality as a benign eccentricity, an innate identity, rather than a personally and societally destructive behavior. The “Children need a Mom and Dad” argument does not confront or defeat those fundamental lies. Weak arguments about the needs of children or the need to protect the rights of others all avoid the harsh realities of the homosexual agenda. By hiding behind “Every Child Needs a Mom and Dad,” the Greater Than coalition of pro-family groups is setting itself up for another failure.

Arthur Schaper, The ‘Greater Than’ Movement Is Not Enough

Tell the TRUTH About Homosexuality!!

If homosexual behavior is not inherently wrong, then there is no basis for preventing its growing acceptance. If pro-family activists won’t tell the plain truth about homosexuality, and won’t reveal the fundamental dishonesty of the agenda and its widespread harms, then all the talk about defending “the children” won’t make a difference. In fact, one could point out that arguing for “The protection of the children” is just another form of bigotry, since opponents of racial integration in the 1950s and 1960s made similar arguments!

Arthur Schaper, The ‘Greater Than’ Movement Is Not Enough

Private Behaviors Have Public Consequences

Private behaviors do have public consequences. Deviant sexual acts harm public health and public order. Most importantly, allowing license for homosexuality has enabled its advocates to become a militant lobby, imposing their worldview on everyone else, and making everyone who disagrees pay the price.

Arthur Schaper, The ‘Greater Than’ Movement Is Not Enough

"Gay Sex”

This is simply impossible. The role of the sex organs is procreation, which cannot be accomplished by two people of the same sex. What “gay men” do is not sex. “Gay sex” is verbal camouflage for sodomy and fellatio, behaviors that disgust normal men. This perversion is nothing but hedonism, mutual masturbation, and the separation of the intense pleasure of procreation from procreation.

The G-d of the Jews’ Bible says, “Be fruitful and multiply,” and because He wanted that, He made procreation a most enjoyable procedure. Someone else once said, “There may be some things better than sex but nothing quite like it.” Thus, sexual deviance is a kind of embezzling of God-given pleasure separated from being fruitful and multiplying.

Sha'i ben-Tekoa, Welcome to Orwell’s World, 12/13/24

Post-modernism and the End of Justice

Postmodernists focus on structures of society rather than the heart. They view as unjust anything resulting from traditional power structures, such as Christianity, the Enlightenment, heterosexism, or patriarchy. Therefore, the postmodern understanding of justice in relation to the law is not actually connected to any objective standards. Rather, it is the process of uncovering the various forms of oppression. This way of thinking continues to creep into judicial decisions, most recently—and notably—through the decision of Supreme Court justice Anthony Kennedy to overthrow the Defense Of Marriage Act (DOMA) because he viewed it as oppressive to people experiencing same-sex attraction. In a similar vein, New Mexico Supreme Court justice Richard Bosson recently wrote an opinion reflection the view of the court that the refusal of a New Mexico photography studio to photograph a gay wedding violated the human rights of a gay couple. In these cases, the battle against “heterosexism” was seen to trump religious and economic freedom.

Jeff Myers & David A. Noebel, Understanding the Times: A Survey of Competing Worldviews, pg.468

Homosexuality and "Pride"

The public sex displays ruined whatever might have been fine about “Pride.” They still say it’s about “love” and “acceptance.” That stopped being true around 2013 in D.C., when it became common for shirtless old men to step out for pride downtown wearing leather harnesses, “transgenders” showing off their mastectomy scars and kinky deviants wearing fetish costumes. That has nothing to do with “love” or societal “acceptance” of romantic adult partners. That’s exhibitionism. And I never consented to being exposed to it. (Which is the same thing as sexual harassment, by the way.)

Eddie Scarry, Gays Ruined ‘Pride’ With Accepting And Engaging In Public Sex

"Pride" Is Not About Love

The public sex displays ruined whatever might have been fine about “Pride.” They still say it’s about “love” and “acceptance.” That stopped being true around 2013 in D.C., when it became common for shirtless old men to step out for pride downtown wearing leather harnesses, “transgenders” showing off their mastectomy scars and kinky deviants wearing fetish costumes. That has nothing to do with “love” or societal “acceptance” of romantic adult partners. That’s exhibitionism. And I never consented to being exposed to it. (Which is the same thing as sexual harassment, by the way.)

Eddie Scarry, Gays Ruined ‘Pride’ With Accepting And Engaging In Public Sex

The REAL LGBTQ+++ Agenda

Many Americans have come to see in recent years that the LGBT agenda was never about love and tolerance, but about forcing every imaginable type of perversity and debauchery in our faces.

Even children have not been exempt from this. In fact, a strong argument could be made that they were the ultimate target of that perversity and debauchery.

After the LGBT movement gained cultural acceptance and even dominance, it redoubled its efforts to evangelize children. Paul Lynde’s Uncle Arthur from “Bewitched” might have been a modest early attempt to win innocent youth, but as time passed the movement got more creative and aggressive, eventually booting up events specifically targeting the family.

Josh Manning, Graphic: Pro-Family Org Infiltrates 'All Ages' 'Pride' Event, Captures Sick Things Really Going on Inside

Read the whole article if you have courage enough to see the example. Disgusting is too weak of a word for this.

Trans Visibility Day

The espoused goal of the LGBTQ community is tolerance. Tolerance means “to put up with.” That may have been the initial goal, but after having achieved it, they upped the ante, seeking affirmation. Are they entitled to tolerance? Yes. But they are not entitled to affirmation—we are not obliged to affirm behavior we find offensive. 

LGBTQ activists, seeking affirmation, have become among the most intolerant people in the nation….These LGBTQ zealots disdain tolerance: their goal is to shove their radical agenda down the throats of Americans, forcing everyone to bow to their demands. They are a threat to religious liberty and to democracy, in general. So, too, are organizations like the Human Rights Campaign and the ACLU which support these efforts.

Bill Donohue, Underside of Trans Visibility Day

The State of the USA

Every perversion known to mankind is being embraced and gradually legalized.  The idea that morality is created by each individual as he makes decisions throughout each day is a step beyond anarchy.

Since Lawrence v. Texas decriminalized homosexuality, we have been in a state of moral anarchy.  Crude and licentious parades with many naked or almost naked men celebrating sodomy are considered by many to be positive and invigorating.   

The abrogation of Roe v. Wade in the recent Dobbs decision does not end abortion, but simply leaves the existence of abortion laws up to each separate state.  There are so many different laws now on when it is legitimate to abort a baby.  Thus, the people have decided that it is legitimate for citizens to decide when a life is a life.

E. Jeffrey Ludwig, Moral Anarchy: An Understatement

Homosexuality vs God

In Romans 1, the Apostle Paul argued that homosexuality opposed God’s creation authority. He did so because God has left a blueprint for sex in our anatomy. Biologically, it’s not hard to see how various parts of our bodies work together. But we deny this blueprint when we apply those parts in ways which they were evidently not designed to be used.

Martyn Iles, The Creator Conflict

"Pride" Month?

But exactly who is supposed to be proud during Pride Month? What are we supposed to be proud of? As the late, great Norm MacDonald once said, it’s not an achievement. You haven’t accomplished anything by being gay. Can boring heterosexuals be proud of being heterosexual? How about sadists, or masochists, or exhibitionists? Voyeurs? I don’t know, stare into a window, even from a distance, and if you’re common riff-raff, you might go to jail. Be listed as a sex offender. I would advise any prospective voyeurs to dress in drag and see what happens. My guess is it will no longer be considered a crime.

Do bisexuals get to have “pride?” Like half-Blacks, maybe only half-pride? What about the impotent, who can’t afford Viagra? Can they be “proud” of their erectile dysfunction? Aren’t they very tangible victims, like so many others? How about the nuns and monks who actually honor their vows of chastity? Shouldn’t that be a source of pride? Isn’t celibacy some kind of virtue? Do the dwindling number of parents with very large families get to be proud of their broods during Pride Month? That used to be the case- parents being proud of having lots of children and all. It seems the definition of “pride” has changed quite a bit. Now, a parent can only be proud of their child if they come out of the closet.

Donald Jeffries, Our Titanic Juneteenth Pride

Upside-Down Culture

There is no ‘right or wrong’ anymore. How’s the old saying from the Woodstock era go, “if it feels good do it.” That philosophy has returned to rear its ugly head.  Drag Queens are now in libraries performing for small children. Gender dysphoria is being promoted instead of treatment and counseling being given to help individuals deal with their confusion.

Rainbow flags and LGBTQ lifestyles are being celebrated with month long parades in cities across America, oftentimes sending confusing messages to the young and impressionable who are being exposed to social issues in schools that should be left to parents to discuss with their children.

And unfortunately in many cases youths are being subjected to what can only be described as ‘grooming’ by pedophiles masquerading as something other than what they truly are, sexual predators who target children and young people.

D.W.Wilbur, Want to End Gun Violence? Change Society, Don't Ban Guns!

New Religion?

LGBTQ is the new religion of worship of self. Pronouns are the new blasphemy.

Think About It

Practitioners of Homosexual Behavior and Children

Research confirms that homosexuals molest children at a rate much higher than heterosexuals, and the mainstream homosexual culture commonly promotes sex with children. Homosexual leaders repeatedly argue for the freedom to engage in consensual sex with children, and blind surveys reveal a shockingly high number of homosexuals admit contact with minors. Indeed, the homosexual community is driving the world-wide campaign to lower the legal age of consent.

Steve Baldwin, "Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement," Whistleblower, Vol.11/No.7 (July 7, 2002), pg.5

Marriage is for Culture, Not Individuals

Marriage doesn’t serve individuals’ or couples’ needs for equality and justice before the law. It serves the cultural need for social norms for how we channel sexual energy in socially beneficial ways. Marriage is the way we socialize men, protect women from the exploitation of unattached males and ensure every child grows up with a mother and a father. This is driven by nature, and it is why we find it in every know society and the major world religions.

Glenn Stanton, Marriage on Trial: The Case Against Same-Sex Marriage and Parenting, pg.46

Homosexuality is NOT Analogous with Race

No academic institution in the world nor any U.S. court has ever established that homosexuality is given at birth and is a permanent feature of an individual like race, nationality and gender are. There are no former Blacks, Whites, Hispanics or Asian folks. But there are hundreds of people documented who have happily and successfully left homosexuality. Homosexuality and race are clearly two different things and therefore should not be treated as similar.

Glenn Stanton, Marriage on Trial: The Case Against Same-Sex Marriage and Parenting, pg. 38

Homosexuality and Pedophilia

Substance abuse, depression and suicide are virtually undisputed as epidemic problems [for those practicing homosexuality], but they are by no means the only problems. One other concern that merits attention is the disproportionate number of male homosexuals who prefer sex with boys. Homosexual men are not necessarily pedophiles. Still, several studies reveal that while no more than 2 percent of male adults are homosexual, approximately 35 percent of pedophiles are homosexual. Further, since homosexual pedophiles victimize far more children than do heterosexual pedophiles (150 to 20), approximately 80 percent of pedophilic victims are boys who are molested by adult males. The number of boys victimized is approximately 3.2 million. It is impossible to determine the number of male pedophiles, but they may constitute as much as 10 percent of male homosexuals. 

Thomas E. Schmidt, “Straight & Narrow? Compassion & Clarity in the Homosexuality Debate, pg.114-115.