Only One Way Works

The moral message my father wanted me to learn from my attempts to fix all those broken clocks is that only one way works.  America’s founders understood this message as well.  They acknowledged that although there may be many different ways to structure human society, only one way works.

But, some may counter, don’t we see many societies structured entirely differently that seem to work?  The answer is that for brief snatches of time, almost anything can work.  Even adultery seems to work during the short moments of stolen bliss.  Running your care without regularly changing the oil might seem to be a new and more economic breakthrough in car ownership, but only for a while.  Eventually the mistake becomes painfully evident.  As mature citizens we have to learn to hear the sinister footsteps of approaching consequences to the well-intentioned policy decisions of today.

We tossed out the moral message of the clocks only a few decades ago.  Until the early 1960s most Americans accepted, often without even thinking about it, the basic ethics of Judeo-Christian thought.  Until the early ‘60s few among our populace doubted that the best citizens are produced in a family in which both a man and a woman raise the children.  Until the early ‘60s nearly everyone believed that it was important for all to work for a living and that living on the dole was sad and even a little shameful.  Until the early ‘60s we even understood that shame was a legitimate component in shaping our society.  “What will the neighbors say?” was a noble expression of concern for community standards.  Today it would be more likely mocked by children raise in the spirit of permissiveness and contempt for any kind of authority.

For less than fifty years we have been living with the result of saying that all ways of organizing families and societies are equally valid.  It is still too early to see impending doom.  Remember, though, that communism (a disastrous rejection of a biblical blueprint if ever there was one) survived just seventy years.  And for those peering ahead into America’s future, the signs are become dismayingly clear.

Rabbi Daniel Lapin, "America's Real War," pg.73

God or Tyrants

If we are not governed by God, then we will be ruled by tyrants.

William Penn, cited David A. Noebel, Understanding the Times, pg.633

Abortion is Unregulated

Amazingly, this dangerous and brutal procedure [abortion] is the only surgery which is legally protected from any sort of government regulation.  There are laws that dictate how tonsils may and may not be removed.  There are laws that dictate how broken bones may and may not be set.  But there are no laws that dictate how abortions may or may not be performed.  Even tort liability restraints upon the abortion industry are being dismantled by the child-killing zealots in government--from the White House to the courthouse.

George Grant, "Grand Illusions: The Legacy of Planned Parenthood," pg.88-89

Darwinian Morality is Bankrupt

Since its advent in the mid-nineteenth century Darwinism has stirred up debate about many questions touching the very heart of human existence.  Not least among these is: How should we live?  While many philosophers and theologians ruled this question outside the purview of science, most prominent advocates of Darwinian theory—including biologists, physicians, social theorists, and popularizers—believed Darwinism had far-reaching ramifications for ethics and morality.  Many argued that by providing a naturalistic account of the origin of ethics and morality, Darwinism delivered a death-blow to the prevailing Judeo-Christian ethics, as well as Kantian ethics and any other fixed moral code.  If morality was built on social instincts that changed over evolutionary time, then morality must be relative to the conditions of life at any given time.  Darwinism—together with other forms of historicism ascendant in the nineteenth century—thus contributed to the rise of moral relativism.

But, interestingly, many Darwinists were not willing to live with complete moral relativism.  They still retained one fixed point of reference—the process of evolution itself.  Since morality arose through evolution, they argued that the purpose of morality is to advance the evolutionary process.   They thereby imported the nineteenth-century cult of progress into evolutionary theory.  The problem with this is that it presupposed that some forms of morality are “better” than others.  But, of course, Darwinism provided no basis to consider some form of morality “better” than any other, or for that matter, it gave no reason to think that morality was “better” in any real sense than immorality.  Yet most used morally charged language quite freely, apparently oblivious to the contradiction this entailed.

Those Darwinists who made the evolutionary process the new criteria for morality radically altered the way that people thought about morality.  Since they generally affirmed that good health and intelligence were key factors in the upward march of evolution, improving physical vitality and mental prowess—especially of future generations—became the highest moral virtue.  The greatest sin was to contribute in some way to the decline of physical life or intellectual ability.  This kind of evolutionary ethics flew in the face of Christian morality, in which one’s health, vitality, and mental faculty play no role in determining moral or immoral behavior.  While Christian morality demands a relationship of love toward God and one’s neighbors, which involves self-sacrifice, evolutionary ethics focussed on breeding better humans, even it if meant sacrificing other people in the process.


Richard Weikart, From Darwin to Hitler, pg.229-230

Marriage As a Social Construction

When traditional marriage is merely a social construction, no principled reason keeps the state from permitting virtually any marital union.  For example, marital arrangements that include two brothers, two sisters, a mother and a son, a father and a son, a mother and a daughter, or a grandfather and a grandson, would be consistent with the philosophical assumptions undergirding the same-sex marriage defense.

And this is not all.  Nor is a polygamous marriage of one man and numerous spouses--which also may include his mother, his grandmother, his grandfather, as well as his adult daughter and son--inconsistent with the same-sex marriage worldview.  Given sexual politics today, one can easily imagine polygamy being reintroduced by an appeal to the sad plight of the bisexual, a person who is incapable of fulfilling his or her marital aspirations with merely one spouse of one gender.  The rhetorical question could be raised: Why should he or she be forbidden from marrying the ones he or she loves?

Of course, we cannot ignore the marital rights of the person who has a deep and abiding affection for the family pet, for then the animal-rights crowd may pipe up and accuse us of speciesism, the prejudice favoring human beings over nonhuman animals.

To be blunt, the state and its institutions (including public schools) could not say that a heterosexual monogamous couple raising three young children in a traditional Christian, Jewish, or Muslim home is a better arrangement for the moral ecology of the community than the marital union of a father and four of his adult children who make their living producing pornographic films of their sexual encounters.  After all, they are all adult consenters, nobody is being coerced, and the state should not prefer one sexual lifestyle over another.

We believe these counterintuitive results occur because most proponents of same-sex marriage presuppose that marriage and family are merely matters of convention and positive law.  That is, because family and marital arrangements aren't particularly sacrosanct or normative, individual members of society may tinker with them as long as they don't interfere with other people's choices.  The state must be "neutral" and assume no overarching good or purpose to human life, relationships, and communities.  Thus those who uphold the philosophy of same-sex marriage must be willing to embrace marital and familial anarchy.


Francis J. Beckwith and Gregory Koukl, “Relativism: Feet Firmly Planted in Mid-Air,” pg.121-122

Sin Becomes Master

At first, sin is like an occasional visitor, then like a guest who stays for a while, and finally like the master of the house.

Rabbi Yetzhak, Genesis Rabbah 22:6.  Cited by Jeffrey Satinover, M.D., Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth, pg. 146

Tyranny for 'Good' of Victims

Of all the tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive.  To be cured against one's will and of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on the level with those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles and domestic animals.

C.S. Lewis, cited by Dr. Tana Dineen, Manufacturing Victims: What the Psychology Industry is Doing to People, pg.67

Compulsory Education

Laws making education in public schools compulsory have historically been found in the most totalitarian of governments where state-sponsored indoctrination was a major goal of the educational system.

Erwin W. Lutzer, When A Nation Forgets God, p.98

Conception Makes You A Mother

The pregnant woman has made a prior choice to have intercourse, a choice that brought another party into her life, a separate little individual whose rights now limit her own freedom of choice.  Choices often lead to conditions that are physically or morally irreversible.  Her choice as to what happens to and in her body should have been made earlier.  It is too late to choose for or against motherhood.  The pregnant woman is already a mother.

Robertson McQuilkin, An Introduction to Biblical Ethics, pg.320-321

The Choice Is Whether to Have Sex

The mother's first two matters of control--sex and birth control--were personal and private.  The issue of abortion is not personal and private.  It directly involves the life of another person and therefore becomes the concern of a decent society.  As a society would protect the life of the mother if someone tried to kill her, so it must protect the life of the child if someone tries to kill him.

Randy Alcorn, "ProLife Answers to ProChoice Arguments," p.115

It's Not About Civil Rights

Greg Koukl puts this very well:  "Same-sex marriage is not about civil rights.  It is about validation and social respect.  It is a radical attempt at civil engineering using government muscle to strong-arm the people into accommodating a lifestyle many find deeply offensive, contrary to nature, socially destructive, and morally repugnant."  Same-sex marriage advocate Andrew Sullivan understands this.  he writes, "Including homosexuals within marriage would be a means of conferring the highest form of social approval imaginable."

Frank Turek, Correct, NOT Politically Correct, pg.12

The Logical Results of Abortion

Once you permit the killing of the unborn child, there will be no stopping.  There will be no age limit.  You are setting off a chain reaction that will eventually make you the victim.

Your children will kill you because you permitted the killing of their brothers and sisters.  Your children will kill you because they will not want to support you in your old age.  Your children will kill you for your homes and estates.

If a doctor will take money for killing the innocent in the womb, he will kill you with a needle when paid by your children.  This is the terrible nightmare you are creating for the future.


Dr. R.A. Gallop, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.  Cited by John Powell, S.J.,  Abortion: the Silent Holocaust, pg.134

It Isn't 'Orientation' They Want Legalized

Make no mistake about it:  It's not homosexual orientation for which gays seek legal protection, but homosexual conduct.  It's not orientation alone which gays want to promote in America's classrooms as being socially acceptable, but homosexual behavior.  Nor is orientation the issue at stake in the movement to gain legal recognition of homosexual marriages and adoptions.  And if you take a close look at the criminal statutes that gays find so offensive, not one prohibits "homosexuality" or "orientation," just sodomy as the expression of this orientation.

F. LaGard Smith, Sodom's Second Coming, p.59

Sin vs 'Mental Illness'?

Unfortunately, what is done all too often is this:  A disease that may not exist is treated with a drug whose action in humans no one really understands while the person undergoes months or years of psychotherapy with no defined therapeutic, measurable endpoints.  Fifty years of research has yielded only symptoms, no biological basis, no cause, and certainly no cure.  Is mental illness a disease or are issues of the heart and people relationships the core issues?  Could sin be to blame?

David Tyler & Kurt Grady, Deceptive Diagnosis: When SIN is called SICKNESS, p.71

It Isn't About Marriage 'Equality'

Traditionally, when any of us seeks a marriage license, we

* can't already be married

* must be an adult and must marry an adult

* can't marry a close family member

* must marry someone of the opposite sex

Now if two people meeting all these criteria go to city hall to get a marriage license, and the clerk asks whether either are homosexual and denies them a marriage license based on an affirmative answer, that would be discriminatory.  Current law does not keep homosexual individuals from marrying.  It just keeps them -- as well as heterosexuals -- from redefining marriage by marrying a person of the same sex.  Our current marriage laws treat everyone equally.

This debate isn't about equality or access to marriage; it's about redefining marriage, making it something it has never been before.


Glenn T. Stanton and Dr. Bill Maier, Marriage on Trial: The Case Against Same-Sex Marriage and Parenting, pg.33

March Of Dimes Is Evil

Founded in 1938 by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, the March of Dimes is one of the world's premier private-sector health and medical associations.  Dedicated to the prevention of birth defects, it raises millions of dollars each year for education, research, and service.  It works to improve maternal and newborn health.  It makes basic clinical grants to hospitals and universities for perinatal and genetic study programs.  It sponsors medical conferences, coordinates symposia, and publishes literature.  Since it successfully led the fight to cure polio during the early fifties, the March of Dimes has become a symbol of hope for millions of parents all around the globe.  But it has also placed itself at the forefront of the Planned Parenthood movement.

Since the early sixties, it has increasingly turned its attentions away from curing genetic disorders and birth defects to detecting and eliminating them.  As a result, amniocentesis and abortion have become its chief concerns, consuming a vast majority of its funding.  Instead of trying to solve the problem of birth defects, the March of Dimes now disposes of those problems by funding "search and destroy" missions.

Eighty-eight percent of all March of Dimes geneticists favor abortion-on-demand.  Seventy-one percent argue that if amniocentesis diagnostic tests prove a child to be defective, he should be terminated regardless of the stage of pregnancy.  A large number even revealed that hey were involved in live fetal experimentation and fetal harvesting.  This despite the persistent claims of the organization that it is "abortion neutral."

The connection between the March of Dimes and Planned Parenthood is not just philosophical.  Many faithful donors would be shocked to discover that the money they have given over the years to "help fight birth defects" has actually wound up in Planned Parenthood coffers.  In 1980, for instance, the March of Dimes gave more than $0.5 million to a Planned Parenthood abortionist for a major research project.  The results of the study, published in Obstetrics and Gynecology, have been widely heralded in pro-abortion circles and selectively circulated by Planned Parenthood affiliates all around the country.

In response to prolife criticism of its close relationship with Planned Parenthood, the national office of the March of Dimes called its critics "ideological zealots eager to invent new enemies."  Today, the kinship between the two groups is friendlier than ever.  They display and distribute each other's literature.  They refer clients back and forth to each other's programs.  They cooperate in sponsoring genetic research and perinatal medical conferences.  And they support each other in their political lobbying efforts.


George Grant, Immaculate Deception: The Shifting Agenda of Planned Parenthood, p.139-140 (1996)  [And things haven't changed a bit.]

Sex Is Worth Waiting For

One of the keys to developing personal significance is the freedom to fail, the freedom not to be perfect.  Such freedom can be present only when a person feels security, when a person feels accepted for who he is, not for what he does.  That kind of security is what young people need to develop in their relationships.  And when they do, it will pay off in their marriage.

When two people are committed to each other, they both have freedom.  They don't need to put on a show to gain the other's approval.  Then, when they are married, they have the security to be themselves, to admit what they do not know.  They don't have to be experts on their honeymoon because they are admitted amateurs.  Part of the thrill of beginning a life together is learning about sex together, guiding and helping each other.   It forms an extremely strong bond in marriage, since, to a greater degree than anything else they will ever encounter, they are doing it together.

That is worth waiting for.


Josh McDowell and Dick Day, "Why Wait?" p.124

America Has Fallen

America cannot fall—because she has already fallen!  This goes for Britain, too.  She cannot go into slavery—because her people are fettered at the moment in the chains of self-forged, self-chosen moral anarchy.  Here are millions, diseased morally, with no longing for healing.  Here are men paying for shadows at the price of their immortal souls, men who not only reject the Substance, but who openly sneer at and caricature it.

An unprecedented tidal wave of commandment-breaking, God-defying, soul-destroying iniquity sweeps the ocean of human affairs.  Never before have men in the masses sold their souls to the devil at such bargain prices.  “There is none . . . that stirreth up himself to take hold of Thee” (Isa.64:7).  What hell-born mesmerism holds them?  How does the spell bind?  Who brainwashed them?  Why don’t they wake and stir themselves?

Directed by the devil, the world has given a new injection to the flesh.  One of the signs of “the last days” is that “men are lovers of pleasures.”  (Note that it is in the plural.)  And where is hell’s broth stewed? In the breweries of the world. . .  Breweries are maternity clinics that breed men-slayers operating with guns, and men driving on the highways while drunken. . . 

The mad merry-go-round of sensuality is filled with millions awaiting their turn for initiation into iniquity.  When wrong is so sweet a morsel, the sin-soaked, sex-slain youth could not care less about doing right.  One crowded hour of glorious “life”—so they argue—is worth a gamble on the speculation of the theologians’ so-called “eternity.

Leonard Ravenhill,  Why Revival Tarries (1959), pg.93-94

Drugging Children Into Compliance

Through natural learning children learn critical thinking, social skills, bonding with friends and family, and develop a genuine interest in knowledge. In structured, rigid schooling, especially the forced government variety, children learn conformity, compliance, memorization, the importance of following arbitrary rules, and to blindly respect those in positions of "authority," whether they deserve it or not. . . . And if children aren’t perfectly conforming to the rigid idea of what is "normal" behavior, if they express themselves, and stand out – then these children are slapped with various diagnoses, then drugged into compliance.

The Absurdity of Public School

HT to J.L. Pattison

The Disaster of Fatherless Children

"Controlling for socioeconomic status, race, and place of residence, the strongest predictor of whether a person will end up in prison is that he was raised by a single parent. By 1996, 70 percent of inmates in state juvenile detention centers serving long-term sentences were raised by single mothers. Seventy-two percent of juvenile murderers and 60 percent of rapists come from single-mother homes. Seventy percent of teenage births, dropouts, suicides, runaways, juvenile delinquents, and child murderers involve children raised by single mothers. Girls raised without fathers are more sexually promiscuous and more likely to end up divorced. A 1990 study by the Progressive Policy Institute showed that after controlling for single motherhood, the difference between black and white crime rates disappeared.

Various studies have come up with slightly different numbers, but all the figures are grim. According to the Index of Leading Cultural Indicators, children from single-parent families account for 63 percent of all youth suicides, 70 percent of all teenage pregnancies, 71 percent of all adolescent chemical/substance abuse, 80 percent of all prison inmates, and 90 percent of all homeless and runaway children.

A study cited in the Village Voice produced similar numbers. It found that children brought up in single-mother homes ‘are five times more likely to commit suicide, nine times more likely to drop out of high school, 10 times more likely to abuse chemical substances, 14 times more likely to commit rape (for the boys), 20 times more likely to end up in prison, and 32 times more likely to run away from home.’ Single motherhood is like a farm team for future criminals and social outcasts.”

Cited by John Hawkins, “Five Consequences of America’s Moral Collapse”

Most Pleasure With Least Regret

People who believe what the Bible teaches about sexuality are sometimes viewed as killjoys, as those who won't let others have any fun.  That's not it at all!  We want people to have the most pleasure with the least regret.  We want people to be more than beasts, more than dogs or donkeys.  We want people to have more than physical trysts that cheapen, demean, and dehumanize.  We want people to enjoy the comprehensive interpersonal union of soul and body in the exclusive, permanent, monogamous, life-producing covenant of marriage.

James M. Hamilton, "Song of Songs," pg. 61

Sex is For Marriage

God has designed physical lover for it to give pleasure in marriage.  Outside of marriage, prior to marriage... love may give pleasure, but it comes with shame, fear, guilt, and regret.  Within marriage, love will please.

James M. Hamilton, "Song of Songs," pg. 61

Lust

You can appreciate beauty without lusting, but if you feed your lust you will make the monster strong and large to devour you.

James M. Hamilton, "Song of Songs," pg.56

Pornography Plague

Our culture suffers from a plague of pornography.  Perhaps nothing more threatens the purity of the church today than the smut the world slobbers over.  Freedom from the filth comes in the desire for a more powerful pleasure.  The degrading, dehumanizing, objectifying prostitution of pleasure on offer from the worlds a twisted perversion of the true satisfaction to be found in the enjoyment of God's good gift within the boundaries of God's good commandments.

James M. Hamilton, "Song of Songs," pg.24

ADHD Voted Into Existence

ADHD was voted into existence in 1987 by a committee of the American Psychiatric Association.  The recognition of ADHD as a "psychiatric disorder" was the culmination of social, political, economic, medical, and psychological factors coming together at just the right time.  Bolstered by politics and money, the outrageous claims of the ADHD industry have persistently escaped scrutiny.  As a result, millions of responsible and loving parents have medicated their children on the advice of the "experts" in child behavior.  Additionally, as an outgrowth of the wildly successful ADHD drug industry, today are the pharmacological treatments for adults who are unable to concentrate.  

David M. Tyler, Ph.D and Kurt P. Grady, Pharm.D,  ADHD: Deceptive Diagnosis, pg. 83

The Tyranny of Ideas

One of the principal lessons of our tragic century, which has seen so many millions of innocent lives sacrificed in schemes to improve the lot of humanity, is -- beware of intellectuals . . . For intellectuals, far from being highly individualistic and non-conformist people, follow certain regular patterns of behavior.  Taken as a group, they are often ultra-conformist within the circles formed by those whose approval they seek and value . . . [enabling] them to create climates of opinion and prevailing orthodoxies, which themselves often generate irrational and destructive courses of action.  Above all, we must at all times remember what intellectuals habitually forget: that people matter more than concepts and must come first.  The worst of all despotisms is the heartless tyranny of ideas.

Paul Johnson, Intellectuals, pg. 342.  Cited by Ravi Zacharias in "The Real Face of Atheism," pg.67

"Brave New World" is Upon Us

Man in control and moving irreversibly closer to the Brave New World is detailed in Aldous Huxley's "fiction" where the words "mother and father" are obscenities; families non-existent; adults totally promiscuous never marrying; and private property non-existent.  Controlled offspring are produced in efficient state-run hatchery laboratories, "decanted" from test tubes, and raise in state institutions where they are encouraged to engage in "erotic play" on the playground.  When depression and the meaninglessness of this life overwhelmed them, the inhabitants self-medicate at will using "soma," a drug to enhance and relax or to reliever anxiety or any cowardly reaction to their existence in the "brave new world."   The Rockefeller agencies appear to be working toward a similar eugenic world for American law, medicine, social sciences, mass communications, and government, while neutralizing the Church and the ministry as effective representatives of the Creator's fixed order.

Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D, "Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences," pg.253

Safe Sex?

Dr. [Patrick] Dixon sums the matter up succinctly:  "Condoms do not make sex safe, they simply make it safer.  Safe sex is sex between two partners who are not infected!  This means a lifelong, faithful partnership between two people who were virgins and who know remain faithful to each other for life."

John Stott, Same-Sex Partnerships?: A Christian Perspective, p.64

Not Many Gentlemen Left

HT Speculative Fiction

Is It Loving?

Most People Do Not Invest In Cohabiting Couples

Marriage "integrates the couple with the larger community" in a way that cohabitation does not, says professor Arland Thornton of the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan -- one of the world's leading schools of family sociology -- in his recent book-length examination of the differences in cohabiting and married couples.  Therefore, he finds, "the relationships of cohabiters with parents and others are often quite different from the family relationships of married people."

Thornton explains that numerous studies published from the mid-eighties to the 2000s find that "cohabiting unions are generally not entered into with the same commitment to the permanence of the relationship that characterizes entrance into marriage."

And this is not jet the couple's commitment but also the feeling of investment that their friends and family have in the marriage.  Others don't have this same feeling of being invested in a cohabiting relationship.  Even as cohabiting becomes more common and socially accepted, it has still be shown that cohabiting couples are more likely to be isolated from their circle of friends and family.

Glenn T. Stanton, The Ring Makes All the Difference, p.44

Psychology Creates Social Pollution

Modern psychology has created widespread "social pollution" by its analytical (and also reductionist) emphasis on the isolated individual and its relentless hostility to social bonds as expressed in tradition, community structures, and the family.

Paul C. Vitz, "Psychology As Religion: The Cult of Self-Worship," p.66

Oh, The Irony of the LEFT!

Liberals support the "right" of an abortionist to kill a woman's unborn baby; of the state to terminate life (euthanasia); and the intentional destruction of human embryos for scientific research (embryonic stem cell research), but don't support the death penalty for convicted murderers because they say that is cruel, unjust and inhumane.  The advocates of "choice" claim "innocent" people could unfairly die.

Gregg Jackson, Conservative Comebacks to Liberal Lies, p.142

Man and Woman -- Equal Yet Different

Commenting on the special creation of Eve, Matthew Henry nearly 300 years ago wrote with quaint profundity that she was "not made out of his head to top him, nor out of his feet to be trampled upon by him, but out of his side to be equal with him, under his arm to be protected, and near his heart to be loved."  Perhaps he got this idea from Peter Lombard who in about AD 1157, just before becoming Bishop of Paris, wrote in his Book of Sentences:  "Eve was not taken from the feet of Adam to be his slave nor from his head to be his lord, but from his side to be his partner."

John Stott, Decisive Issues Facing Christians Today, p.263-264

Love vs Lust

In his new book, Lust, [Simon] Blackburn presents an updated vision of lust as sexual desire for its own sake.  If lust now has a bad press, Blackburn wants to be its public relations agent.  Lust is inevitably compared with love.  Blackburn understands the quandary, noting, "We smile at lovers holding hands in the park.  But we wrinkle our noses if we find them acting out their lust under the bushes.  Love receives the world's applause.  Lust is furtive, ashamed, and embarrassed.   Love pursues the good of the other, with self-control, concern, reason, and patience.  Lust pursues its own gratification, headlong, impatient of any control, immune to reason."  As a moral philosopher, Blackburn understands that love requires knowledge, reason, and time, combined with truth and trust.  Lust, on the other hand, is symbolized by "a trail of clothing in the hallway" that represents a loss of reason, self-control, and discipline.

R. Albert Mohler, Jr., Desire and Deceit: The Real Cost of Sexual Tolerance, p.13

IBM Helped With the Holocaust

IBM custom-designed the indispensable systems that located European Jews and other undesirables, and then provided a multiplicity of custom-tailored punch card programs to help the Nazis trace family trees, index bank accounts and other property, organize eugenic campaigns and even manage extermination in death camps. . . . 

Just after Hitler rose to power, IBM initiated an aggressive commercial compact with Nazi Germany, generating windfall profits as it organized and systemized the Reich's anti-Jewish and eugenic programs.  As the Hitler regime took each step in its war against the Jews and all of Europe, IBM custom-designed the punch cards and other data processing solutions to streamline those campaigns into what the company described as "blitzkrieg efficiency."

It began in 1933, when the company designed and executed Hitler's first census.  From there, IBM's involvement with the Reich mushroomed.  On January 8, 1934, IBM opened a million-dollar factory in Berlin to manufacture Hollerith machines and coordinate data processing functions.  At the factory opening, the manager of IBM's German subsidiary, Willi Heidinger, spoke vividly about what IBM technology would do for Germany's biological destiny.  Standing next to the personal representative of IBM president Thomas J. Watson, and with numerous Nazi Party officials in attendance at a ceremony bedecked by swastika flags and Storm Trooper honor guards, Heidinger emotionally declared that population statistics were key to eradicating the unhealthy, inferior segments of German society. . .  

Most of Heidinger's speech, along with a list of the invited Nazi Party officials, was rushed to Manhattan and immediately translated for Watson.  The IBM leader cabled Heidinger a prompt not of congratulations for a job well done and sentiments well expressed.


Edwin Black, "War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race," p.290, 308-309

The Fraud of Big Drug Companies

If everyone has the ill, then all must take the pill.  Already huge, the market in psychotropic drugs is constantly growing.  When the adult market seemed saturated, the drug companies expanded their customer demographics by pushing product onto children -- it is not by accident that all the recent epidemics of psychiatric disorder have occurred in kids.  And children are particularly choice customers -- bring them on board early, and you may have them for life.  At the other end of the life cycle, companies targeted the elderly, selling antipsychotics like hotcakes in nursing homes.  Pharma has not been constrained by the fact that children and the elderly are the two most difficult demographic groups to diagnose accurately or that they are the most vulnerable to harmful drug side effects or that excessive use of antipsychotics in nursing homes results in increased mortality.  And, even more troubling, it is the very most vulnerable of kids who get the most medicine -- those who are economically disadvantaged or in foster care.

Seven percent of Americans are now addicted to a legal psychotropic drug.  Prescription drug abuse has become a bigger problem than illicit drug abuse.  If there is a conceivable way to sell a new diagnosis so that people will incorrectly believe they have it, drug companies will have figured it out and will do it successfully -- if sometimes illegally.  Big Pharma seems to feel above the law.  Almost all of the companies have absorbed huge fines and even criminal penalties as punishment for their illegal sales practices.

Allen Frances, M.D, "Saving Normal," p.95

The Fraud of Psychotherapeutic Drugs

Since drugs like Valium do not treat any specific disease, does that mean that they are not effective?  On the contrary, such drugs are exceedingly effective as psychotherapeutic agents not because of their pharmacological properties but because they enhance the basic components of psychotherapy.  They are compatible with a Western cultural worldview which posits that everything can be helped by modern technology - better living through chemistry.  They enhance the personal qualities of the therapist because giving a drug demonstrates the caring quality of the therapist; the client may be symbolically taking home little pieces of the therapist in a pill bottle.  Drugs dramatically increase a client's expectations that he or she will improve, and this is known to be a major source of the effectiveness of all pharmacological agents.  Finally, drugs are used to increase a person's sense of mastery.  An injunction to "take one of these three times a day and you will cope with stress better" is analogous to the major elixirs used in mythology; it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy and the person does cope better.

E. Fuller Torrey, M.D., Witchdoctors and Psychiatrists: The Common Roots of Psychotherapy and Its Future, p.81

Only a Housewife?

HT Speculative Fiction

The Psychotherapy Culture

Several studies have shown that mental health professionals are heavily concentrated in university towns and in affluent communities where the college-educated settle.  The problems for which most of these people seek help are not serious mental illness, but rather intrapersonal (e.g., low self-esteem) and interpersonal (e.g., marital) difficulties.  (Indeed, "It was recently reported that in one part of the United States [an academic setting] the principal presenting symptom for patients who offer themselves to be analyzed by analysts-in-training is the difficulty of completing their Ph.D. dissertations.")  Freud himself stated, "The optimum conditions for . . . [psychoanalytic psychotherapy exist where not needed -- i.e., among the healthy."  Thus professional mental health resources are strongly oriented toward the worried well rather than the suffering sick.

E. Fuller Torrey, M.D., in "Freudian Fraud: the Malignant Effect of Freud's Theory on American Thought and Culture," p.208

Scientists Are Biased

Scientists come in two basic forms, male and female, and they are just like you and me.  They have beliefs and biases.  A bias determines what you do with the evidence, especially the way in which you decide that certain evidence is more relevant or important that other evidence.  Scientists are not objective truth-seekers; they are not neutral.

Ken Ham, The Lie, p.8

No One Is Responsible

The nebulous notion of "defective mental condition" evolved in later cases into saying that someone "suffering from an abnormal condition of the mind" was not responsible for his crime.  To follow this logic, the more horrible the crime, the further the criminal departed from civilized norms and by definition the more "abnormal" his mental condition.  By such reasoning, every violation of law should be excused.

Thomas Sowell, "The Vision of the Anointed," p.156

Independence?

Pandora's Box

Artistry by Dan Lietha of Answers In Genesis

What is a Right?

Liberals think a right is some sort of cosmic force that guarantees them whatever they want.

Matt Walsh

Are Facts Truth?

Facts do not speak for themselves.  Truth does not reside in facts as such.  Only fact plus meaning can be the basis for truth.  And the meaning does not arise naturally out of facts.  Rather, meaning is something attributed to facts from the outside.  It is necessary to presuppose a world view or framework within which a fact can have meaning.  Otherwise, one is left with bare, meaningless facticity.  Facts and experience may be the basis for meaning, but the data alone cannot provide what meaning should be given to it.  Unless the "stuff" of experience is structured by a meaning-model, then it is not possible to speak of the meaningfulness or truth of that system of interpretation.  One must indeed presuppose a metaphysical model of the universe before it is even possible to make ultimate truth claims.

Norman L. Geisler, Christian Apologetics, p.127

Skeptical About Reality?

The overall skeptical attempt to suspend all judgment about reality is self-refuting, since it implies a judgment about reality.  How else could on know that suspending all judgment about reality was the wisest choice, unless he knew indeed that reality was unknowable?

Norman L. Geisler, Christian Apologetics, p.22

Who Controls the Future?

Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past.

George Orwell

HT to The Looking Spoon

Government "Education"

Entertainment Now Is Moral Authority

Film and [other] visual entertainment are a pervasively important part of our culture, an extremely significant influence on the way our society operates.  People in the film industry don't want to accept the responsibility that they had a hand in the way the world is loused up.  But, for better or worse, the influence of the church, which used to be all-powerful, has been usurped by film.  Films and television tell us the way we conduct our lives, what is right and wrong.  When Burt Reynolds is drunk on beer in Hooper and racing cops in his rocket car, that reinforces the recklessness of the kids who've been drawn to the movie in the first place and are probably sitting in the theater drinking beer.

George Lucas, cited by Ron Rhodes, The Culting of America, p.125

"Transgender" Is A LIE

Obviously Bruce Jenner is still a man, he’s DNA and biologically male, he’s not woman. It doesn’t matter whether you wear a wig or you grow your hair out and you have plastic surgery or you go through some kind of vocal shaving to change the pitch of voice — it doesn’t make any difference!

You’re still the person with which you were born…at birth you’re either male or female. You can’t change that. Although you might change your hairstyle and change your looks: you can change your appearance through surgery, it doesn’t change anything.

Mat Staver, Bruce Jenner Illustrates Sin, Not Change

Who Raises Your Children?

When a child is passed from one caretaker to another, what kind of emotional bonding does that child experience (or not experience)?

How can values be passed on from parent to child when the dominant influences in a child's life are paid caretakers, television, and Nintendo games?

Since children model behavior from their parents, what kind of parents will the children themselves be when they grow up to adulthood?


Ron Rhodes, The Culting of America, p.56

America Is the Greatest Country

What should we tell out children?  We should say that America is the greatest country on earth, but it is not because Americans are brighter, more competent, stronger, or luckier than other people.  No, the credit must go elsewhere.  America is what she is because her founders chose to follow the Word of God.  America is as successful as she is because of the Christian system of values our founders implanted in this land.

Rabbi Daniel Lapin, "America's Real War," p.73


[America is fast throwing away this legacy as we become more and more corrupt with our government -- AND citizens.]

The Role of Government

Government was established by God to manifest and preserve His justice on earth.  This is government's central purpose; as such, the state should concentrate on enforcing justice and avoid meddling in other institutions' business.  Generally speaking, the church was ordained to manifest God's grace on earth, and the family to manifest God's community and creativity (including procreativity).  The government, then, as the institution of justice, should prohibit, prevent, prosecute, and punish injustice.  The church, as the institution of grace, should preach the gospel and be the chief vehicle of charitable aid to the needy.  And families should have chief responsibility for bearing, raising, and educating children, and for creating, possessing, and disposing of property.

Each of these institutions is limited by its own definition and by the other two.  Because government is an institution of justice, not of grace or community or creativity, it should not interfere with freedom of religion, attempt to dispense grace through tax-funded handouts, control family size, interfere with raising children (including education), or control the economy and the disposition of property.  Because the church is an institution of grace, not of justice or community or creativity, it should not attempt to control criminal law systems, to garner the support of the state for its work, or to control family size or business.  And because the family is an institution of community and creativity, it should not use government or the church for its own ends.

David A. Noebel, Understanding the Times, p.628

The Corrosion of Evil is Winning

Destructive and irresponsible freedom has been granted boundless space.  Society has turned out to have scarce defense against the abyss of human decadence, for example against the misuse of liberty for moral violence against young people, such as motion pictures full of pornography, crime, and horror.  This is all considered to be a part of freedom and to be counterbalanced, in theory, by the young people's right not to look and not to accept.  Life organized legalistically has thus shown its inability to defend itself against the corrosion of evil.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn, cited by Phillip E. Johnson, The Right Questions: Truth, Meaning & Public Debate, p.162

Margaret Sanger's Legacy

In her book Women and the New Race, Margaret Sanger asserted that "the most merciful thing a large family can do to one of its infant members is to kill it."  Today, Planned Parenthood's commitment to that philosophy is self-evident.  The organization is the world's number-one abortion provider.  It has aggressively fought the issue through the courts.  It has made killing infant members of large families its highest priority.  Bad seen brings forth bitter harvest.  The legacy continues.

George Grant, "Grand Illusions: The Legacy of Planned Parenthood," p.63

Darwinism Boosted Racism

Racism existed long before Darwin, of course, but Darwinism did radicalize racism in the late nineteenth century, providing scientific justification for racial inequality, racial competition, and even racial extermination.  In harmony with the rising tide of positivism and materialism, Darwinism also helped sweep aside ethical considerations, which had been a restraint on racial extermination (albeit not always very effective.).

Richard Weikart, From Darwin to Hitler, p.203

The Foundation Of Same-Sex Fake Marriage

The original mission of the homosexual-rights movement called for social tolerance.  Now it demands social approval through questioning the state's partiality toward heterosexual monogamy.  The movement bases its arguments on the twin dogmas of personal subjective relativism and absolute autonomy, upon which it seeks to build the foundation for same-sex marriage.

Francis J. Beckwith and Gregory Koukl, “Relativism: Feet Firmly Planted in Mid-Air,” p.118

Origin of Homosexual Feelings

What did the psychoanalysts learn that activists want us to forget?  That in the lives of their homosexual patients there was unusually often an emotional mismatch between the child and same-sex parent (such as a father who subtly or overtly rejects a son who has many "feminine" traits); or an emotional mismatch between the child and the opposite sex parent; or sexual abuse or a child by either the same sex or opposite sex parent; and most often the rejection of a child by same-sex peers.

Jeffrey Satinover, M.D., Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth, p.104

Sticks and Stones

Years ago, children used to have a playground chant: "Sticks and stones may break my bones but names'll never hurt me."  They knew the differences between insults and assaults.  But today the Psychology Industry is telling everyone that an angry word hurts like a bullet.  With psychologists' help, everyone can share the experience of victims and by doing so, can come to see themselves as victims.

Dr. Tana Dineen, Manufacturing Victims: What the Psychology Industry is Doing to People, p.62

Learn to Discern

Create a critical mass of people who cannot discern meaning and truth from nonsense, and you will have a society ready to fall for the first charismatic leader to come along.

Richard Terrell, Resurrecting the Third Reich, p. 176.  Cited by Erwin W. Lutzer, When A Nation Forgets God, p.82

It's NOT All About You

By concentrating day and night on your feelings, potentials, needs, wants and desires, and by learning to assert them more freely, you do not become a freer, more spontaneous, more creative self; you become a narrower, more self-centered, more isolated one.  You do not grow, you shrink.

Daniel Yankelovich, New Rules: Searching for Self-Fulfillment in a World Turned Upside Down, p.242.  Cited by Robertson McQuilkin, An Introduction to Biblical Ethics, p.271

"Reproductive Rights"?

"Abortion rights" are not reproductive rights, but child-killing rights.

Randy Alcorn, "ProLife Answers to ProChoice Arguments," p.114

It Isn't About Marriage

For homosexuals, this debate isn't even about marriage.  As data from countries with same-sex marriage show, approximately 96% of homosexuals don't get married when they are given the opportunity.  And those who do get married break up at a much higher rate than heterosexuals.

Since most homosexuals don't want to get married or stay married, then why are homosexual activists so adamant about government recognition of same-sex marriage?  Because same-sex marriage will win them what they really want -- validation and normalization.  In other words, the activists want same-sex marriage because they understand that government-backed same-sex marriage will validate and normalize homosexuality throughout society.

The key point here is "government-backed."  Homosexuals can already "marry" one another privately.  There is just no government provision for it.  Nothing is stopping homosexuals from pledging themselves to one another in private same-sex marriage ceremonies.  In fact, it is done all the time -- there is an entire cottage industry for gay weddings.

But that's not enough for homosexual activists.  What they want is government endorsement for their relationships.  They know that such endorsement will make homosexuality and their behavior appear just as normal as heterosexuality.  That's why the same-sex marriage movement has more to do with respect than rights.

Frank Turek, Correct, NOT Politically Correct, p. 10-11

Abortionists' Lies

We fed the public a line of deceit, dishonesty, a fabrication of statistics and figures.  We succeeded [in breaking down the laws limiting abortion] because the time was right and the news media cooperated.  We sensationalized the effects of illegal abortions, and fabricated polls which indicated that 85 percent of the public favored unrestricted abortion, when we knew it was only 5 percent.  We unashamedly lied, and yet our statements were quoted [by the media] as though they had been written in law.

Dr. Bernard N. Nathanson, from an address to the Winnipeg League for Life, April 25, 1981.  cited by John Powell, S.J.,  Abortion: the Silent Holocaust, p.75

No Discrimination Against Orientation

If sexual orientation were the only issue, there never would be an issue.  No one discriminates against other people on the basis of the particular sexual attractions a person might privately feel within himself.  It bears repeating:  Unless someone acts upon his orientation, or tells another person about it, there is no way that anyone would ever know.  . . . 

Those who oppose gay-rights legislation are not reacting in outrage to anyone's particular orientation, but only to the insistence that one be given an unlimited moral right to express that orientation sexually.  That's even more than society is willing to give heterosexuals!


F. LaGard Smith, Sodom's Second Coming, p.57

Slaves to Psychology

Today, Americans turn to psychological cures as reflexively as they once turned to God.  But our relationship to the psyche appears to have exceeded that of believers and become more like that of cult members.  And almost slavish devotion to psychological health and emotional problems dominates our culture.

Eva S. Moskowitz, In Therapy We Trust.  Cited by David Tyler & Kurt Grady, Deceptive Diagnosis: When SIN is called SICKNESS, p.59

Marriage and Family

[T]he purpose of marriage . . .  has always been to make the family secure, not to redefine what constitutes a family.  The family is a more fundamental social reality than a marriage, and so pretending that anything we call a marriage can create a family is misleading. . . .  By family, I mean a lasting, socially enforced obligation between a man and a woman that authorizes sexual congress and the supervision of children. . . .  There is no society where women alone care for each other and their children; there is non where fathers are not obligated to support their children and the mothers to whom they were born.  Not only do men need women, women need men.


James Q. Wilson, The Marriage Problem: How Our Culture Has Weakened Families, pp.24, 29.  Cited by Glenn T. Stanton and Dr. Bill Maier, Marriage on Trial: The Case Against Same-Sex Marriage and Parenting, p.23

Planned Parenthood's Lack of Ethics

Ninety-five percent of the women surveyed said that their Planned Parenthood counselors gave "little or no biological information about the fetus which the abortion would destroy."  Eighty percent said that their counselors gave "little or no information about the potential health risks which might follow the surgery."  Sixty-eight percent felt that "the procedure was not described with any degree of depth or clarity."  Eighty-nine percent said that their counselor was "strongly biased in favor of the abortion."  That is not exactly the kind of track record you would expect from those who proudly march under the banner of "choice." 

George Grant, Immaculate Deception: The Shifting Agenda of Planned Parenthood, p.57

Guard Your Mind

I do not believe most Christians make a single willful decision to commit fornication.  Rather, it is a series of smaller decisions which allow for improper thinking to enter in.  Once the mind has been contaminated with impure thoughts and desires, it becomes much easier for us to make wrong decisions.

Josh McDowell and Dick Day, "Why Wait?" p.109

Toxic Psychiatry

Hyperactivity is the most frequent justification for drugging children.  The difficult-to-control male is certainly not a new phenomenon, but attempts to give him a medical diagnosis are the product of modern psychology and psychiatry.  At first psychiatrists called hyperactivity a brain disease.  When no brain disease could be found, they changed it to "minimal brain disease" (MBD).  When no minimal brain disease could be found, the profession transformed the concept into "minimal brain dysfunction."  When no minimal brain dysfunction could be demonstrated, the label became attention deficit disorder.  Now it's just assumed to be a real disease, regardless of the failure to prove it so.  Biochemical imbalance is the code word, but there's no more evidence for that than there is for actual brain disease.

Peter Breggin, Toxic Psychiatry, p.278, Cited by David M. Tyler, Ph.D and Kurt P. Grady, Pharm.D,  ADHD: Deceptive Diagnosis, p. 82-83

Ethics Is Obsolete

Ours is an age where ethics has become obsolete.  It is superceded by science, deleted by philosophy and dismissed as emotive by psychology.  It is drowned in compassion, evaporates into aesthetics and retreats before relativism.  The usual moral distinctions between good and bad are simply drowned in a maudlin emotion in which we feel more sympathy for the murderer than for the murdered, for the adulterer than for the betrayed, and in which we have actually begun to believe that the real guilty party, the one who somehow caused it all, is the victim, and not the perpetrator of the crime.

Robert E. Fitch, "The Obsolescence of Ethics," Christianity and Crisis: A Journal of Opinion, 19, no. 19 (November 16, 1959), 163-65. Cited by Ravi Zacharias in "The Real Face of Atheism," p.65-66

Marriage Defined

Marriage, N. [Fr. Marriage, from marrier, to marry, from mari, a husband; L. max, mari; Sp. Maridage.]  The act of uniting a man and woman for life; wedlock; the legal union of a man and woman for life.  Marriage is a contract both civil and religious, by which the parties engage to live together in mutual affection and fidelity, till death shall separate them.  Marriage was instituted by God himself for the purpose of preventing the promiscuous intercourse of the sexes, for promoting domestic felicity, and for securing the maintenance and education of children.

Noah Webster, "American Dictionary of the English Language," 1828

A Pill Won't Solve Everything

The biblical answers to your heart’s discomforts are not found in a pill.

Elyse Fitzpatrick & Laura Hendrickson, M.D., "Will Medicine Stop the Pain?", p.98

What Are "Gay Rights"?

"Gay rights" implies that homosexual people are suffering a wrong which should be righted.  But what is this oppression, this wrong, this injustice?  If it is that they are being despised and rejected by sections of society on account of their sexual inclination, are in fact victims of homophobia, they indeed they have a grievance which must be addressed.  For God opposes such discrimination and requires us to love and respect all human beings without distinction.  If, on the other hand, the "wrong" or "injustice" complained of is society's refusal to recognize homosexual partnerships as a legitimate alternative to heterosexual marriages, then talk of "justice" in inappropriate, since human beings may not claim as a "right" what God has not given them.

John Stott, Same-Sex Partnerships?: A Christian Perspective, p.56,57